reportingrisk.com← the monitorSEC reporting failures, scored and checked against what happened next

Or browse all companies A–Z.

Lesaka Technologies Inc

LSAK · Nasdaq

No reporting failures in the last 12 months

It filed on time and stood behind its numbers. Of companies scoring zero, 4.0% were delisted, went bankrupt, restated or stopped filing within the following year.

$252Mpublic float
2025-09-16most recent failure
2025-09-10declared past accounts unreliable

Score over time

012202220232024202520262023-07-01 · score 12023-05-09 auditor change2023-10-01 · score 12023-05-09 auditor change2024-01-01 · score 12023-05-09 auditor change2024-04-01 · score 12023-05-09 auditor change2025-10-01 · score 22025-09-16 filed late (10-K) · restatement2025-09-10 accounts unreliable2026-01-01 · score 22025-09-16 filed late (10-K) · restatement2025-09-10 accounts unreliable2026-04-01 · score 22025-09-16 filed late (10-K) · restatement2025-09-10 accounts unreliable2026-07-01 · score 22025-09-16 filed late (10-K) · restatement2025-09-10 accounts unreliable

Hover or tap a dot to see the filings behind that score.

Why they said they were late

Lesaka Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") was unable, without unreasonable effort or expense, to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2025 by the prescribed deadline. As disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2025, the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee"), following consultation with its management and KPMG Inc, its independent registered public accounting firm, concluded that the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended September 30, 2024, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2025, respectively, included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2024, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2025, respectively (the "Quarterly Reports"), should be restated, and that such unaudited condensed financial statements should no longer be relied upon, due to the Company's re-evaluation of the classification of certain revenue that has been reported as an agent rather than as principal, and related cost of goods sold. The Company anticipates that the restatement will have no impact on its reported operating income (loss), net loss or loss per share or its net cash flows or liquidity. The restatement is expected to result in an increase in its revenue, with the increase in revenue expected to be offset by a corresponding increase in its cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support. The registrant has commenced the restatement process. In light of the restatement of the Quarterly Reports and the filing due date for the Form 10-K, the registrant requires additional time to prepare and review the consolidated financial statements for the Form 10-K. The registrant is currently unable to estimate the timing for the filing of the Form 10-K

NT 10-K, filed 2025-09-16 · restatement

What it filed

2025-09-16filed late (10-K)restatement SEC →

Lesaka Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") was unable, without unreasonable effort or expense, to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2025 by the prescribed deadline. As disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2025, the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee"), following consultation with its management and KPMG Inc, its independent registered public accounting firm, concluded that the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended September 30, 2024, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2025, respectively, included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2024, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2025, respectively (the "Quarterly Reports"), should be restated, and that such unaudited condensed financial statements should no longer be relied upon, due to the Company's re-evaluation of the classification of certain revenue that has been reported as an agent rather than as principal, and related cost of goods sold. The Company anticipates that the restatement will have no impact on its reported operating income (loss), net loss or loss per share or its net cash flows or liquidity. The restatement is expected to result in an increase in its revenue, with the increase in revenue expected to be offset by a corresponding increase in its cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support. The registrant has commenced the restatement process. In light of the restatement of the Quarterly Reports and the filing due date for the Form 10-K, the registrant requires additional time to prepare and review the consolidated financial statements for the Form 10-K. The registrant is currently unable to estimate the timing for the filing of the Form 10-K

2025-09-10accounts declared unreliable SEC →

2023-05-09auditor changed or resigned SEC →

About this score

reportingrisk.com scores every active US filer on three things a company tells the SEC about itself: late-filing notices on Form NT, 8-K item 4.02 (past accounts declared unreliable) and 4.01 (auditor changes). 1,012 are flagged today.

Every score is frozen and checked twelve months later. Across 91,452 of them, a company scoring 4 or more ended that year delisted, bankrupt, restated or silent 17.2% of the time, against 4.0% for a clean record. Scores before 2026-09-27 were reconstructed from the filing history as it stood at each date, so the record is a backtest rather than years of live calls.

See the ledger → Every company the score flagged that later failed, what it told the SEC on the way down, and the ones it missed.

Every item above is a filing this company made with the SEC.
Snapshot 2026-11-04 · data from SEC EDGAR (public domain) · not investment advice

reportingrisk.com← back to the monitorAll companies A-Z · RSS · found an error? hello@reportingrisk.com