reportingrisk.com← the monitorSEC reporting failures, scored and checked against what happened next

Or browse all companies A–Z.

Cardiff Lexington Corp

CDIX · OTC

No reporting failures in the last 12 months

It filed on time and stood behind its numbers. Of companies scoring zero, 4.0% were delisted, went bankrupt, restated or stopped filing within the following year.

$45Mpublic float
2025-08-14most recent failure

Score over time

0246202220232024202520262022-01-01 · score 42021-11-12 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2021-08-24 filed late (10-Q/A) · restatement2021-08-16 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2021-06-24 auditor change2022-04-01 · score 62022-03-17 auditor change2022-02-17 accounts unreliable2021-11-12 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2021-08-24 filed late (10-Q/A) · restatement2021-08-16 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready+1 more2022-07-01 · score 52022-03-17 auditor change2022-02-17 accounts unreliable2021-11-12 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2021-08-24 filed late (10-Q/A) · restatement2021-08-16 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2022-10-01 · score 32022-03-17 auditor change2022-02-17 accounts unreliable2021-11-12 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2023-01-01 · score 22022-03-17 auditor change2022-02-17 accounts unreliable2023-07-01 · score 22023-05-24 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2023-04-03 filed late (10-K) · accounts not ready2023-10-01 · score 32023-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2023-05-24 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2023-04-03 filed late (10-K) · accounts not ready2024-01-01 · score 32023-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2023-05-24 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2023-04-03 filed late (10-K) · accounts not ready2024-04-01 · score 32023-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2023-05-24 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2023-04-03 filed late (10-K) · accounts not ready2024-07-01 · score 12023-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2024-10-01 · score 12024-09-19 auditor change2025-01-01 · score 22024-10-17 accounts unreliable2024-09-19 auditor change2025-04-01 · score 22024-10-17 accounts unreliable2024-09-19 auditor change2025-07-01 · score 22024-10-17 accounts unreliable2024-09-19 auditor change2025-10-01 · score 32025-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2025-08-14 accounts unreliable2024-10-17 accounts unreliable2026-01-01 · score 22025-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2025-08-14 accounts unreliable2026-04-01 · score 22025-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2025-08-14 accounts unreliable2026-07-01 · score 22025-08-14 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2025-08-14 accounts unreliable

Hover or tap a dot to see the filings behind that score.

Why they said they were late

Cardiff Lexington Corporation (the “Company”) is unable to file, without unreasonable effort or expense, its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 (the “10-Q”)‎ within the prescribed time period because additional time is required to finalize its financial statements and related disclosures required to be included in the 10-Q. The Company expects to file the 10-Q within five calendar days following the prescribed due date

NT 10-Q, filed 2025-08-14 · accounts not ready

What it filed

2025-08-14filed late (10-Q)accounts not ready SEC →

Cardiff Lexington Corporation (the “Company”) is unable to file, without unreasonable effort or expense, its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 (the “10-Q”)‎ within the prescribed time period because additional time is required to finalize its financial statements and related disclosures required to be included in the 10-Q. The Company expects to file the 10-Q within five calendar days following the prescribed due date

2025-08-14accounts declared unreliable SEC →

2024-10-17accounts declared unreliable SEC →

2024-09-19auditor changed or resigned SEC →

2023-08-14filed late (10-Q)accounts not ready SEC →

The Registrant is unable to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2023 (the “Form 10-Q”) because of unanticipated delays in the completion of its financial statements and related portions of the Form 10-Q, which delays could not be eliminated by the Registrant without unreasonable effort and expense

2023-05-24filed late (10-Q)accounts not ready SEC →

The Registrant is unable to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2023 (the “Form 10-Q”) because of unanticipated delays in the completion of its financial statements and related portions of the Form 10-Q, which delays could not be eliminated by the Registrant without unreasonable effort and expense

2023-04-03filed late (10-K)accounts not ready SEC →

The Registrant is unable to file the subject report in a timely manner because the Registrant was not able to complete timely its financial statements without unreasonable effort or expense

2022-03-17auditor changed or resigned SEC →

2022-02-17accounts declared unreliable SEC →

2021-11-12filed late (10-Q)restatement SEC →

Reference is made to Form 12b-25/A filed by the Registrant on August 24, 2021 (the “Prior 12b-25”) with respect to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021 (the “2021 Second Quarter 10-Q”). The Registrant changed audit firms in June 2021. Previously, the Registrant’s independent public accounting firm was Daszkal Bolton LLP (“DB”), which audited the Registrant’s financial statements contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (the “2020 Form 10-K”). In preparing the 2021 Second Quarter 10-Q, the Registrant’s current independent public accounting firm, Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman, P.A. (“RRBB”), raised issues with certain of the line items and disclosures in the 2020 Form 10-K that they determined rendered them unable to provide a review of the Second Quarter 10-Q, which resulted in the inability of the Registrant to File the 2021 Second Quarter 10-Q. As indicated in the Prior 12b-25, the Registrant was informed by DB that it believed that there are no errors in the financial statements contained in the 2020 Form 10-K. At the time of filing of the Prior 12b-25, the Registrant had retained a consulting firm to assist it in a review and, if necessary, a revision of its 2019-2020 financial statements. At the time of filing the Prior 12b-25, the Registrant was unable to determine when that review and, if applicable, revision would be complete and whether it would require a restatement or other adjustment of its financial statements for 2019-2020 and interim periods within those fiscal years. For certain convertible notes in default containing embedded derivatives (the “Notes”), the Registrant erroneously valued the derivative liability using an intrinsic method. There was a change in methodology for these Notes that began during the December 31, 2019 audit

2021-08-24filed late (10-Q/A)restatement SEC →

The Registrant changed audit firms in June 2021. Previously, the Registrant’s independent public accounting firm was Daszkal Bolton LLP (“DB”), which audited the Registrant’s financial statements contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (the “2020 Form 10-K”). In preparing the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 (the “Affected 10-Q”), the Registrant’s current independent public accounting firm, Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman, P.A. (“RRBB”), has raised issues with certain of the line items and disclosures in the 2020 Form 10-K that they believe renders them unable to provide a review of the Affected 10-Q, which results in the inability of the Registrant to File the Affected 10-Q. The Registrant has been informed by DB that it believes that there are no errors in the financial statements contained in the 2020 Form 10-K. The Registrant has retained a consulting firm to assist it in a review and, if necessary, a revision of its 2019-2020 financial statements but is unable at this time to determine when that review and, if applicable, revision will be complete and whether it will require a restatement or other adjustment of its financial statements for 2019-2020 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The letter of RRBB required by Rule 12b-25(c) accompanies this Form12b-25/A as an exhibit

2021-08-16filed late (10-Q)accounts not ready SEC →

The Registrant is unable to file the subject report in a timely manner because the Registrant was not able to complete timely its financial statements without unreasonable effort or expense

2021-06-24auditor changed or resigned SEC →

About this score

reportingrisk.com scores every active US filer on three things a company tells the SEC about itself: late-filing notices on Form NT, 8-K item 4.02 (past accounts declared unreliable) and 4.01 (auditor changes). 1,012 are flagged today.

Every score is frozen and checked twelve months later. Across 91,452 of them, a company scoring 4 or more ended that year delisted, bankrupt, restated or silent 17.2% of the time, against 4.0% for a clean record. Scores before 2026-09-27 were reconstructed from the filing history as it stood at each date, so the record is a backtest rather than years of live calls.

See the ledger → Every company the score flagged that later failed, what it told the SEC on the way down, and the ones it missed.

Every item above is a filing this company made with the SEC.
Snapshot 2026-11-04 · data from SEC EDGAR (public domain) · not investment advice

reportingrisk.com← back to the monitorAll companies A-Z · RSS · found an error? hello@reportingrisk.com