reportingrisk.com← the monitorSEC reporting failures, scored and checked against what happened next

Or browse all companies A–Z.

reAlpha Tech Corp.

AIRE · Nasdaq

No reporting failures in the last 12 months

It filed on time and stood behind its numbers. Of companies scoring zero, 4.0% were delisted, went bankrupt, restated or stopped filing within the following year.

$6Mpublic float
2025-05-16most recent failure

Score over time

0122024202520262024-01-01 · score 12023-12-18 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2024-04-01 · score 12023-12-18 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2024-07-01 · score 12023-12-18 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2024-10-01 · score 12023-12-18 filed late (10-Q) · accounts not ready2025-07-01 · score 22025-05-16 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2025-04-01 filed late (10-K) · auditor2025-10-01 · score 22025-05-16 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2025-04-01 filed late (10-K) · auditor2026-01-01 · score 22025-05-16 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2025-04-01 filed late (10-K) · auditor2026-04-01 · score 22025-05-16 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2025-04-01 filed late (10-K) · auditor

Hover or tap a dot to see the filings behind that score.

Why they said they were late

ed time period. reAlpha Tech Corp. (the “Registrant,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has determined that it is not able to file its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025 (the “Form 10-Q”) within the prescribed time period without unreasonable effort or expense. The Registrant requires additional time to allow its auditor to complete the review of its condensed consolidated financial statements and related portions of the Form 10-Q. The Registrant presently expects to file the Form 10-Q within the extension period of five calendar days as provided under Rule 12b-25

NT 10-Q, filed 2025-05-16 · auditor

What it filed

2025-05-16filed late (10-Q)auditor SEC →

ed time period. reAlpha Tech Corp. (the “Registrant,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has determined that it is not able to file its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025 (the “Form 10-Q”) within the prescribed time period without unreasonable effort or expense. The Registrant requires additional time to allow its auditor to complete the review of its condensed consolidated financial statements and related portions of the Form 10-Q. The Registrant presently expects to file the Form 10-Q within the extension period of five calendar days as provided under Rule 12b-25

2025-04-01filed late (10-K)auditor SEC →

ed time period. reAlpha Tech Corp. (the “Registrant,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has determined that it is not able to file its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (the “Form 10-K”) within the prescribed time period without unreasonable effort or expense. The Registrant requires additional time to allow its auditor to complete the review of its consolidated financial statements and related portions of the Form 10-K. The Registrant presently expects to file the Form 10-K within the extension period of 15 calendar days as provided under Rule 12b-25

2023-12-18filed late (10-Q)accounts not ready SEC →

ed time period. reAlpha Tech Corp. (the “Registrant,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is unable to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended October 31, 2023 (the “Form 10-Q”) within the prescribed time period without unreasonable effort and expense to the Registrant. The Registrant requires additional time to allow it to complete the review of its condensed consolidated financial statements for the required periods ended October 31, 2023. The Registrant presently expects to file the Form 10-Q within the extension period of five calendar days as provided under Rule 12b-25

About this score

reportingrisk.com scores every active US filer on three things a company tells the SEC about itself: late-filing notices on Form NT, 8-K item 4.02 (past accounts declared unreliable) and 4.01 (auditor changes). 1,012 are flagged today.

Every score is frozen and checked twelve months later. Across 91,452 of them, a company scoring 4 or more ended that year delisted, bankrupt, restated or silent 17.2% of the time, against 4.0% for a clean record. Scores before 2026-09-27 were reconstructed from the filing history as it stood at each date, so the record is a backtest rather than years of live calls.

See the ledger → Every company the score flagged that later failed, what it told the SEC on the way down, and the ones it missed.

Every item above is a filing this company made with the SEC.
Snapshot 2026-11-04 · data from SEC EDGAR (public domain) · not investment advice

reportingrisk.com← back to the monitorAll companies A-Z · RSS · found an error? hello@reportingrisk.com