reportingrisk.com← the monitorSEC reporting failures, scored and checked against what happened next

Or browse all companies A–Z.

American Bitcoin Corp.

ABTC · Nasdaq

No reporting failures in the last 12 months

It filed on time and stood behind its numbers. Of companies scoring zero, 4.0% were delisted, went bankrupt, restated or stopped filing within the following year.

$58Mpublic float
2025-09-25most recent failure

Score over time

012202220232024202520262022-01-01 · score 12021-05-18 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2022-04-01 · score 12021-05-18 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2024-07-01 · score 12024-04-26 auditor change2024-10-01 · score 12024-04-26 auditor change2025-01-01 · score 12024-04-26 auditor change2025-04-01 · score 12024-04-26 auditor change2025-10-01 · score 12025-09-25 auditor change2026-01-01 · score 12025-09-25 auditor change2026-04-01 · score 12025-09-25 auditor change2026-07-01 · score 12025-09-25 auditor change

Hover or tap a dot to see the filings behind that score.

Why they said they were late

Akerna Corp. (the “Company”) is filing this Notification of Late Filing on Form 12b-25 with respect to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 (the “Form 10-Q”). The Company was unable to file its Form 10-Q within the prescribed time period provided by the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission without unreasonable effort and expense for the reasons discussed below. On April 12, 2021, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a statement (the “SEC Statement”) on the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by SPACs entitled, “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”). The SEC Statement discussed “certain features of warrants issued in SPAC transactions” that “may be common across many entities.” The SEC Statement indicated that when one or more of such features is included in a warrant, the warrant “should be classified as a liability measured at fair value, with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings.” Following consideration of the guidance in the SEC Statement, while the terms of the Company’s private placement warrants have not changed, the Company has concluded that its private placement warrants do not meet the conditions to be classified in equity and instead, the warrants meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815-40-15, under which the Company should record the warrants as liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company has determined to reflect this reclassification of the warrants for the Company’s previous audited balance sheets on June 30, 2019 and 2020 and December 31, 2020 (the “Affected Period”) as a revision footnote in the Form 10-Q and is reviewing this approach with its independent registered public accounting firm, Marcum LLP

NT 10-Q, filed 2021-05-18 · auditor

What it filed

2025-09-25auditor changed or resigned SEC →

2024-04-26auditor changed or resigned SEC →

2021-05-18filed late (10-Q)auditor SEC →

Akerna Corp. (the “Company”) is filing this Notification of Late Filing on Form 12b-25 with respect to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 (the “Form 10-Q”). The Company was unable to file its Form 10-Q within the prescribed time period provided by the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission without unreasonable effort and expense for the reasons discussed below. On April 12, 2021, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a statement (the “SEC Statement”) on the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by SPACs entitled, “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”). The SEC Statement discussed “certain features of warrants issued in SPAC transactions” that “may be common across many entities.” The SEC Statement indicated that when one or more of such features is included in a warrant, the warrant “should be classified as a liability measured at fair value, with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings.” Following consideration of the guidance in the SEC Statement, while the terms of the Company’s private placement warrants have not changed, the Company has concluded that its private placement warrants do not meet the conditions to be classified in equity and instead, the warrants meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815-40-15, under which the Company should record the warrants as liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company has determined to reflect this reclassification of the warrants for the Company’s previous audited balance sheets on June 30, 2019 and 2020 and December 31, 2020 (the “Affected Period”) as a revision footnote in the Form 10-Q and is reviewing this approach with its independent registered public accounting firm, Marcum LLP

About this score

reportingrisk.com scores every active US filer on three things a company tells the SEC about itself: late-filing notices on Form NT, 8-K item 4.02 (past accounts declared unreliable) and 4.01 (auditor changes). 1,012 are flagged today.

Every score is frozen and checked twelve months later. Across 91,452 of them, a company scoring 4 or more ended that year delisted, bankrupt, restated or silent 17.2% of the time, against 4.0% for a clean record. Scores before 2026-09-27 were reconstructed from the filing history as it stood at each date, so the record is a backtest rather than years of live calls.

See the ledger → Every company the score flagged that later failed, what it told the SEC on the way down, and the ones it missed.

Every item above is a filing this company made with the SEC.
Snapshot 2026-11-04 · data from SEC EDGAR (public domain) · not investment advice

reportingrisk.com← back to the monitorAll companies A-Z · RSS · found an error? hello@reportingrisk.com