reportingrisk.com← the monitorSEC reporting failures, scored and checked against what happened next

Or browse all companies A–Z.

Heliogen, Inc.

No reporting failures in the last 12 months

It filed on time and stood behind its numbers. Of companies scoring zero, 4.0% were delisted, went bankrupt, restated or stopped filing within the following year.

$11Mstalepublic float
2022-06-06most recent failure
2025-08-12delisted or deregistered
2022-05-17declared past accounts unreliable

Score over time

01234202220232024202520262022-01-01 · score 22021-11-16 accounts unreliable2021-05-18 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2022-04-01 · score 22021-11-16 accounts unreliable2021-05-18 filed late (10-Q) · auditor2022-07-01 · score 42022-06-06 auditor change2022-05-17 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2022-05-17 accounts unreliable2021-11-16 accounts unreliable2022-10-01 · score 42022-06-06 auditor change2022-05-17 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2022-05-17 accounts unreliable2021-11-16 accounts unreliable2023-01-01 · score 32022-06-06 auditor change2022-05-17 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2022-05-17 accounts unreliable2023-04-01 · score 32022-06-06 auditor change2022-05-17 filed late (10-Q) · restatement2022-05-17 accounts unreliable

Hover or tap a dot to see the filings behind that score.

Why they said they were late

Heliogen, Inc. (the “Company”) was unable to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (the “Q1 Form 10-Q”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within the prescribed time period. As previously disclosed, on May 16, 2022, the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Audit Committee”), based on the recommendation of, and after consultation with, the Company’s management, and as discussed with BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, concluded that the Company’s previously issued audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Affected Financials”) should no longer be relied upon and should be restated. As part of the Company’s accounting for revenue contracts with customers during the first quarter of 2022, management considered ongoing contracts that were entered into and accounted for during the year ended December 31, 2021. During this evaluation, it was determined that a government contract which had previously been assessed as within the scope of ASC 606, Revenue from Contract with Customers (“ASC 606”), should have been accounted for as a government grant and therefore not within the scope of ASC 606. The impact of this revised conclusion results in the reversal of a contract loss recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, which results in a reduction in net loss as compared to the net loss reported in the Company’s previously issued financial statements, and re-evaluation of revenue and costs presented for this contract. The reconsideration of the government contract as a government grant will change the timing and nature of reporting for the contract but will not change the expected overall economics of the contract

NT 10-Q, filed 2022-05-17 · restatement

What it filed

2022-06-06auditor changed or resigned SEC →

2022-05-17filed late (10-Q)restatement SEC →

Heliogen, Inc. (the “Company”) was unable to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (the “Q1 Form 10-Q”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within the prescribed time period. As previously disclosed, on May 16, 2022, the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Audit Committee”), based on the recommendation of, and after consultation with, the Company’s management, and as discussed with BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, concluded that the Company’s previously issued audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Affected Financials”) should no longer be relied upon and should be restated. As part of the Company’s accounting for revenue contracts with customers during the first quarter of 2022, management considered ongoing contracts that were entered into and accounted for during the year ended December 31, 2021. During this evaluation, it was determined that a government contract which had previously been assessed as within the scope of ASC 606, Revenue from Contract with Customers (“ASC 606”), should have been accounted for as a government grant and therefore not within the scope of ASC 606. The impact of this revised conclusion results in the reversal of a contract loss recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, which results in a reduction in net loss as compared to the net loss reported in the Company’s previously issued financial statements, and re-evaluation of revenue and costs presented for this contract. The reconsideration of the government contract as a government grant will change the timing and nature of reporting for the contract but will not change the expected overall economics of the contract

2022-05-17accounts declared unreliable SEC →

2022-01-06auditor changed or resignednot counted — change of control SEC →

2021-11-16accounts declared unreliable SEC →

2021-05-18filed late (10-Q)auditor SEC →

Athena Technology Acquisition Corp. (the “ Company ”) has determined that it is unable, without unreasonable effort or expense, to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2021 (the “ Q1 2021 Form 10-Q ”) by the prescribed due date for the reasons described below. On April 12, 2021, the Acting Director of the Division of Corporation Finance and Acting Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission together issued a statement regarding the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by special purpose acquisition companies entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies” (the “ SEC Statement ”). As a result of the SEC Statement, the Company’s management reevaluated the accounting treatment of (i) the 8,333,333.33 redeemable warrants that were included in the units issued by the Company in its initial public offering (the “ Public Warrants ”) and (ii) the 233,333.67 redeemable warrants that were issued in the private placement units issued in a private placement (the “ Private Warrants ”, collectively with the Public Warrants, the “ Warrants ”) in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ ASC ”) 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging: Contracts in an Entities Own Equity. ASC 815-40 states entities must consider whether to classify contracts that may be settled in its own stock, such as warrants, as equity of the entity or as an asset or liability. The Company previously accounted for the Warrants as components of equity. After consideration of the guidance in the SEC Statement, the Company concluded that the Warrants should be accounted for as a liability and measured at fair value with changes in fair value each period reported in the Company’s statement of operations

About this score

reportingrisk.com scores every active US filer on three things a company tells the SEC about itself: late-filing notices on Form NT, 8-K item 4.02 (past accounts declared unreliable) and 4.01 (auditor changes). 1,012 are flagged today.

Every score is frozen and checked twelve months later. Across 91,452 of them, a company scoring 4 or more ended that year delisted, bankrupt, restated or silent 17.2% of the time, against 4.0% for a clean record. Scores before 2026-09-27 were reconstructed from the filing history as it stood at each date, so the record is a backtest rather than years of live calls.

See the ledger → Every company the score flagged that later failed, what it told the SEC on the way down, and the ones it missed.

Every item above is a filing this company made with the SEC.
Snapshot 2026-11-04 · data from SEC EDGAR (public domain) · not investment advice

reportingrisk.com← back to the monitorAll companies A-Z · RSS · found an error? hello@reportingrisk.com